Toxic shock syndrome can be caused by staphylococcus aureus or group A streptococcus in children. Non-menstrual and menstrual toxic shock syndrome have similar incidence in the general population nowadays due to the increased awareness and recent changes to the composition of tampons. Clinical assessment looking for fever, symptoms suggestive of multisystem dysfunction, and a desquamative rash and supported by evidence of acute renal injury and hepatic injury is diagnostic of toxic shock syndrome. Antibiotic therapy is indicated.
Are you more of a visual learner? Check out our online video lectures and start your pediatric infectious diseases course now for free!

Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) Bacteria

Image: “Scanning electron micrograph of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA, brown) surrounded by cellular debris. MRSA resists treatment with many antibiotics.” by NIAID/NIH. License: Public Domain


Definition and Epidemiology of Toxic Shock Syndrome in Children

Toxic shock syndrome can be defined as acute illness caused by toxin-producing staphylococcus aureus and presenting with multi-organ failure in addition to fever, rash, hypotension, and skin manifestations.

Epidemiology

One of the most common causes of toxic shock syndrome was the use of tampons in menstruating adolescent girls. Nowadays, the tampons used need to be changed more often so they are less likely to cause staphylococcus aureus bacterial growth and toxic shock syndrome. The current incidence of toxic shock syndrome related to the use of tampons in female adolescents and young adults is approximately 0.5 per 100,000.

  • Systemic effects, typically from a small or insignificant seeming source
  • 50 % of cases are from tampons (all staph aureus), especially superabsorbent tampons.

Nowadays, the incidence of toxic shock syndrome related to the use of tampons and those that are not related to tampon usage is almost equal. One particular group of children that is at risk of developing toxic shock syndrome is that admitted to the burns unit due to skin burns. Approximately, 10 % of these children might end up with toxic shock syndrome.

Toxic shock syndrome was found to be uncommon in children younger than 10 years for obscure reasons. Another common cause of toxic shock syndrome in children is postoperative complication. Approximately, 16 in every 100,000 who undergo an ear, nose or throat surgery will develop toxic shock syndrome.

Children are also at risk of developing streptococcal toxic shock syndrome. Group A streptococcus is responsible for approximately 4 in every 100,000 general population cases of toxic shock syndrome per year. While streptococcal toxic shock syndrome is more common in the elderly, children aged younger than 2 years are at a particular increased risk.

While children might develop streptococcal toxic shock syndrome, mortality rate is usually lower compared to adults. Mortality rate of streptococcal toxic shock syndrome in children is estimated to be around 5 %.

Pathophysiology of Toxic Shock Syndrome in Children

Toxic shock syndrome is most likely an immune mediated disorder that is activated by a superantigen. This superantigen is most likely a toxin produced by certain strains of staphylococcus aureus.

Staphylococcus aureus gram stain

Image: “Microscopic image of Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 25923). Gram staining, magnification:1,000.” by Y Tambe. License: CC BY-SA 3.0

The most commonly produced toxins responsible for staphylococcal toxic shock syndrome in children are toxic shock syndrome toxin 1 (TSST-1) and enterotoxins. TSST-1 is responsible for about 90 % of the cases of staphylococcal toxic shock syndrome.

Staphylococcus aureus strains that produce TSST-1 are commonly identified in the vagina and in the nasopharynx of patients presenting with toxic shock syndrome. This explains the clear association between toxic shock syndrome and the use of tampons in menstruating women or ear, nose and throat surgery in non-menstruating children.

Streptococcal superantigens are responsible for the other form of the disease known as streptococcal toxic shock syndrome. Group A invasive streptococcus are more likely to produce these superantigens, hence their association with the development of toxic shock syndrome.

Another important risk factor for the development of toxic shock syndrome in children is the lack of specific antibodies against TSST-1 or streptococcal superantigens. Patients without a proper immune response are more likely to develop recurrent toxic shock syndrome and the disease might be more invasive.

Clinical Presentation of Toxic Shock Syndrome in Children

Patients usually present with fever and multiorgan failure. Multiorgan failure manifests as hypotension, acute renal injury, and abnormal liver function. Fever is usually high grade, > 39° C. Vomiting, diarrhea, altered level of consciousness, confusion and desquamative skin rash are commonly found in staphylococcal toxic shock syndrome.

Patients with streptococcal toxic shock syndrome might have a fever or not. They usually present with severe systolic hypotension, acute respiratory distress syndrome, a generalized desquamative skin rash and localized soft tissue necrosis.

Patients might also develop myositis or necrotizing fasciitis. Renal impairment and coagulopathy along with an increased risk of bleeding disorders are commonly seen in patients with toxic shock syndrome due to group A invasive streptococcus.

Recent medical history can also help differentiate between staphylococcal and streptococcal toxic shock syndrome. Patients with staphylococcal toxic shock syndrome might have recent history of use of tampons, or skin burns.

On the other hand, patients with streptococcal toxic shock syndrome might develop the condition as a superimposed infection after the eruption of a varicella related rash.

Gastrointestinal symptoms are more common with staphylococcal toxic shock syndrome while inflammation of the muscles and an elevated creatinine kinase are more commonly seen in streptococcal toxic shock syndrome.

Involvement of 3 organ systems:

  • Hepatitis
  • Thrombocytopenia
  • CNS (altered mental status)

Late finding: peeling hands/feet

Diagnostic Workup for Toxic Shock Syndrome in Children

Patients with toxic shock syndrome develop multisystem dysfunction. To diagnose staphylococcal toxic shock syndrome, the patient has to have a fever, a skin rash, hypotension and desquamation. In addition to that, three of the following signs of multisystem dysfunction are needed to confirm the diagnosis.

Symptoms suggestive of gastrointestinal involvement or severe myalgia in addition to an elevated serum creatinine and serum urea nitrogen levels suggestive of acute renal injury. Elevated total bilirubin, AST and ALT levels are suggestive of hepatic injury. Thrombocytopenia can be also found in staphylococcal toxic shock syndrome.

Bacteremia is rare in staphylococcal toxic shock syndrome but if a blood culture was performed it may be positive for staphylococcus aureus. Other causes of a similar clinical picture such as Rocky Mountain spotted fever or measles should be excluded by serologic tests.

Patients with streptococcal toxic shock syndrome are expected to have a similar semiology but they are more likely to have an elevated creatinine kinase suggestive of myonecrosis. Creatinine levels are usually elevated due to acute kidney injury. Thrombocytopenia and impaired hepatic function is also seen with streptococcal toxic shock syndrome.

A chest x-ray in streptococcal toxic shock syndrome might reveal a characteristic picture of diffuse lung edema and infiltrates typical of acute respiratory distress syndrome. Blood cultures are more likely to be positive with streptococcal toxic shock syndrome compared to staphylococcal because bacteremia is more common with streptococcal etiology.

Other potential causes of presentation

  • Allergic reaction
  • Serum sickness
  • Scarlet fever
  • Tick-borne illness (RMSF, ehrlichia)
  • Measles
  • Meningitis/encephalitis

Treatment of Toxic Shock Syndrome in Children

  • Examine all post-pubertal females immediately to remove possible retained tampon, even if no history of retention!
  • Treat all sources of infection (strep throat, drain any abscesses, etc.)
  • Supportive care (IV boluses, dopamine, airway support, etc.)
  • IVIG may be used in severe cases.

Patients with toxic shock syndrome should be admitted to the burns unit as they are usually hemodynamically unstable. In addition to adequate fluid replacement therapy, proper antibiotic use is also warranted.

Patients with probable or confirmed staphylococcal toxic shock syndrome should undergo a full examination to identify the most likely origin of the infection. Tampons if found should be removed and skin abscesses should be drained.

Nafcillin chemical structure

Image: “Structural diagram of nafcillin.” by Fvasconcellos – Own work. License: Public Domain

Antibiotic use is then indicated. Nafcillin, oxacillin or a first generation cephalosporin are first-line therapies for staphylococcus aureus infections. If the patient is found to have a methicillin-resistant strain of staphylococcus aureus, he or she should be switched to vancomycin.

The problem with nafcillin, oxacillin and cephalosporins is that they are more likely to cause an acute increase of the release of TSST-1 once initiated. Because of this, clindamycin, erythromycin or rifampin have been suggested to be used as first-line therapies for staphylococcal toxic shock syndrome.

Streptococcal toxic shock syndrome should be treated with clindamycin. Recent studies suggest the combination of clindamycin with penicillin for optimum results with streptococcal toxic shock syndrome. Unfortunately, mortality remains higher with streptococcal toxic shock syndrome compared to staphylococcal toxic shock syndrome.

  • Vancomycin in case of resistance
  • Clindamycin may reduce toxin production
  • Cefazolin kills faster early in disease

Transition to PO cephalexin or clindamycin with stabilization and target any obtained organism

Patients with severe shock might benefit from receiving intravenous immunoglobulins in addition to antibiotic therapy as intravenous immunoglobulins can be effective when used in case of superantigens.

Do you want to learn even more?
Start now with 500+ free video lectures
given by award-winning educators!
Yes, let's get started!
No, thanks!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *