Congenital uterine anomalies, also known as Mullerian duct malformations, are quite common in women. Approximately, 0.001 to 10% of women are diagnosed with a congenital uterine anomaly depending on the studied population and the method used. Most identified anomalies of the female reproductive tract are found within the uterus. Isolated cervical, vaginal, or fallopian tube defects are much rarer compared to uterine anomalies.
Are you more of a visual learner? Check out our online video lectures and start your Radiology course now for free!


Image: “Ultrasound Scan ND” by Dilmen Nevit. License: CC BY-SA 3.0

Introduction to Imaging of Mullerian Duct Anomalies

The most common risk factors for uterine anomalies are the maternal use of thalidomide or diethylstilbestrol during pregnancy. Fortunately, awareness about the teratogenicity of these two medications has contributed significantly to lower the incidence of Mullerian duct anomalies.

Embryogenesis and Abnormal Development of the Female Reproductive Tract

To understand how uterine anomalies occur in women, it is advisable to take a step back and try to understand the normal embryogenic development of the female reproductive system. The female genitourinary system develops from a common embryonic mesoderm that has Mullerian and wolfian duct systems. The regression of the wolfian duct system is based on the absence of the SRY gene found on chromosome Y. The Mullerian ducts are divided into upper and lower segments by the ligamentum inguinal which later becomes the round ligament. The upper Mullerian segment is responsible for the development of the fallopian tubes whereas the lower segment gives rise to the uterus and the upper four fifths of the vagina.

Bilateral deficient Mullerian duct development leads to absent vagina, cervix, and uterus in addition to absent fallopian tubes. Failure of Mullerian ductal fusion is responsible for the anomalies uterine didelphys, bicornuate uterus and arcuate uterus. Failure of resorption of the medial walls of the vagina and uterus is the mechanism of formation of a complete septate or partial septate uterus. Abnormal hormone balance which is linked to the maternal use of diethylstilbestrol can cause a T-shaped uterus. The most common type of uterine anomalies is arcuate or hypoplastic uteri. Unicornuate or bicornuate uterus are two common examples of an arcuate uterus.

Up to one tenth of the cases of congenital uterine malformations also have associated anomalies of the urinary tract, gastrointestinal tract, musculoskeletal system, or the heart. Endometriosis is more common in malformed uteri compared to normally developed ones. Renal agenesis is very common in patients with uterus didelphys and Unicornuate uterus.
Despite the association with other anomalies, the risk of neoplasms in patients with congenital uterine malformations appears to be equal to the general population.

Diagnostic Workup and Imaging Studies of the Malformed Uterus

Most patients with congenital uterine malformations present to the clinic because of a history of recurrent spontaneous abortions or amenorrhea.

Note: Spontaneous abortions are most common with T-shaped uteri, septate uteri, and unicornuate uterus.

The diagnosis of a malformed uterus can be delayed due to the operator dependency of ultrasonography, the first imaging modality used in the evaluation of structural uterine anomalies in a patient with recurrent abortions. The increased incidence of spontaneous abortions and infertility might be related to the direct effect of the abnormal uterus on the implantation of the uterus or the co-presence of cervical incompetence. Cervical incompetence is found in up to one-third of the women with congenital uterine malformations.

Ultrasonography and Congenital Uterine Malformations

The accuracy of transvaginal ultrasound in the identification of congenital uterine malformations is excellent, 82 to 92%. Vaginal and cervical atresia in addition to uterus didelphys are reliably identified on ultrasound. On the other hand, septate uterus, unicornuate uterus, and other less common uterine malformations are poorly visualized and recognized with ultrasonography.

Another drawback of ultrasonography in the identification of congenital uterine malformations is the operator dependency. Additionally, obese patients usually have ultrasound images of lower quality and the identification of uterine anomalies might be problematic.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Congenital Uterine Malformations

Magnetic resonance imaging studies have an estimated accuracy of 100% in identifying almost any type of uterine anomalies. It can identify vaginal, cervical and uterine anomalies reliably. Septate, unicornuate and bicornuate uterine malformations can be easily identified on a magnetic resonance imaging study. Additionally, magnetic resonance imaging of the fallopian tubes, ovaries and other pelvic structures makes it easy for the radiologist to identify endometriosis even in initial stages.

Note: The main disadvantage of ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging studies is the fact that both can be only diagnostic but not therapeutic.

Laparoscopy and Congenital Uterine Malformations

The direct visualization of the external contour of the uterus can be helpful in the differentiate between bicornuate and septate uterus. Hysteroscopy is helpful in the identification of intrauterine adhesions and septa. These two techniques can be also used for adhesolysis or other treatments.

Examples of Uterine Malformations and the Imaging of Malformations

In the following table, we show some common congenital uterine malformations, the imaging modality of choice for the visualization of that malformation, and the main characteristics one can see on that specific imaging modality for that specific anomaly.

Uterine Anomaly Imaging Modality of Choice Main Imaging Findings
Hypoplastic Uterus Magnetic Resonance Imaging A small uterus with regular morphology and normal relationship to the uterus.
Hysterosalpingography can be also used with good results.
Unicornuate Uterus Magnetic Resonance Imaging Decreased uterine volume with asymmetry. The presence of a uterine horn that is rudimentary. Ultrasonography can be confusing and some cases were missed by conventional transvaginal ultrasound.
Uterine didelphys Ultrasonography or Magnetic Resonance Imaging Uterine didelphys can be easily diagnosed with either transvaginal ultrasound or magnetic resonance imaging. Divergent uterine horns, fundal cleft, two services and a vaginal septum are the most common findings on both imaging modalities.
Bicornuate Uterus Ultrasonography, Magnetic Resonance Imaging or hysterosalpingography This uterine anomaly can be easily identified by any of the three mentioned imaging modalities, therefore, the most cost-effective method is advisable, i.e. ultrasound. T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging images are best at the visualization of the two uterine horns.
Septate Uterus Magnetic Resonance Imaging or hysterosalpingography T2-weighted images on magnetic resonance imaging are very accurate in the identification of the uterine septum. Hysterosalpingography is helpful as it can show a septum that is associated with uterine contraction. The septum appears hypoechoic on ultrasonography but it can be missed in a significant number of cases.
T-shaped uterus Hysterosalpingography In contrast to all the previously mentioned anomalies, a T-shaped uterus is best visualized with a hysterosalpingography. Magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound are inferior in the identification of this anomaly. Suspicion of this anomaly is based on the maternal history of using diethylstilbestrol during pregnancy.
Do you want to learn even more?
Start now with 500+ free video lectures
given by award-winning educators!
Yes, let's get started!
No, thanks!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *