Ophthalmology: Basic Principles with Carlo Raj

I cannot understand how Lecturio managed to find so many other competent professors to teach, anatomy, physiology (wonderful!!), histology (ditto!!), internal medicine etc and yet ended up with Raj as the pathology professor for almost ALL the pathology. I thank Lecturio for how much they helped me with the aforementioned subjects but with regards to pathology, I am very disappointed. His lectures are too fast, not detailed enough, he doesn't teach so much as he summarizes only a few key facts while leaving out other important information that I then have to look up myself or subscribe to another website such OSMOSIS, PICMONIC, MEDSKL that do a significantly better job at explaining pathology. It is obvious that Raj is passionate about pathology but he should really read the comments left by the majority of viewers and not the very few 5 stars he gets from the same 3 people. YOU CAN DO BETTER LECTURIO AND DR. RAJ but you must choose to do better and put in the work. I may recommend Lecturio for all the other topics, but as for pathology, I will not be recommending Lecturio, which is very unfortunate.

He takes in count the most important points and try to make us think logically.

It´s great how the most important clinical points of diabetic retinopathy are explained with pathophysiology. I love how he tries to make us undertand how things work instead of memorizing information.

He takes into consideration the most important points. One of the greatest teachers in this platform.

Great explanation, he takes the most important points to consider. I love the associations he made. One of the greatest teachers in this platform. Congrats.

I liked the explanation of the professor although i think it would be nice to have more information!

what a terrible way to teach ! I really hate this teacher and his weird and distracting manner. Additionally put some more information about the ophthalmology please !

This video helps me tremendously in understanding the pathology of glaucoma and how to differentiate angle-closure and open angle glaucoma. Excellent job Dr Raj. Thanks for everything!

Horrible pronunciation, below the level of any online studying platform.......

With all due respect, Dr Raj's presentation style is very distracting and this was not useful at all. I genuinely wonder why he is featured so extensively on this platform as he detracts from the utility of this resource.

It missing a LOT of info in categorising Diabetic Retinopathy. NOT ENOUGH EVEN FOR A RECAP

Lecturer tone and structure is erratic and very difficult to follow.

Disgusting. Very bad quality. Not enough information and the information presented isn't adequate

This professor speaks very fast and all of his speech turns into gibberish, his accent is very disturbing and unpleasant. I don't like his lectures, the material is very badly explained and a lot of important things are not mentioned at all, i am doubting this professor's professionalism and competence, it doesnt look like he knows material well, he doesnt look confident explaining. i am hoping for the better professor in the future.

Not good teaching, bit too fast. Not easy to understand

I think there is much more to tell about cataracts (including management options) than we see in this presentation

Excellent overview of the uvea for step 1. Dr Raj covers what's necessary for the boards. Great professor

Good overview of conjunctivitis. He mentioned covering corneal ulcer elsewhere but i couldn't find the video.

This professor speaks too fast and his accent is very disturbing. I wish Dr. Alverson could cover this subject too.

I liked it quite a bit. The course is very useful, although I wish there would be more regarding disorders of visual acquity.

Hola Muchas Gracias por la introducción al curso me es muy útil. aunque en cornea falto agregar Queratocono. Agradezco su lectura y sigo aprendiendo de usted.

Not good explanation , can do it much better. Upset one

Dr Raj made a good introduction. Maybe somebody wants a huge explanaiton, but the title of the video es "optic Pathology: Introduction" and his introduction is simple and clear.

WORST TEAHER EVER THEY SHOULD FIRE HIM REALLY BAD AND GET PROFESSORS FOR EACH TOPICS NOT ONE FOR EVERY TOPIC

Great Segway into the biochem pathway and linking it with various eye dz.

I like Dr. Raj's style of teaching but this course is very shallow. I would have preferred more detail or more topics covered, this feels more like a very brief introduction to ophthalmology than a complete course on the subject.

he is talking too fast and not explaining anything. he is like a radio turned on.

Not helpful at all, i can do a better job learning it through my book

the subject was not presented clearly and i found the accent to be a bit disturbing

i would like it to have way more content than it has and more images, sorry

i rated this presentation because it is well prepared and well summarised medical students and residents should go through it.

not good enough. Lecture is not helpful for examination. i dont like it.

is these all about disorders of lens???? why do u make too short lecture?

This is not adequate, speech should be slower and clear.

I love the method of teaching... topics are wonderfully explained in simple english

This course is easy to understand for me and would recommend. The lecturer is also funny sometimes, it makes learning fun!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

many topics not covered like field defects,optic reflex,horner syndrome,