Valence Electrons – Quantum Numbers

by Adam Le Gresley, PhD

Questions about the lecture
My Notes
  • Required.
Save Cancel
    Learning Material 2
    • PDF
      Slides 02 Chemistry Basics Le Gresley v03.pdf
    • PDF
      Download Lecture Overview
    Report mistake

    00:01 magnesium: in the 3s. So you may have heard me to use the term valence electrons. What do I mean by that? Well, remember what I said right at the very beginning of this course: that when it comes to chemistry, we're really only interested in electrons.

    00:13 If you're interested in protons and neutrons, then that's nuclear physics. What we're interested in is electrons, because it's electron movement which is responsible for the chemistry and interactions that we observe. And valence electrons are effectively those electrons in the outer shell. Those are the electrons which are furthest away from the nucleus, which engage in the reactions. As indicated earlier, if you look at an idealized drawing (shown on the board here), which considers electrons as particles, it's only those electrons which are in the outermost shell (in this case, we're looking at carbon) that actually are responsible for the interaction with other electrons in the outer shells of other atoms.

    01:01 So if we consider carbon as an example here, we see that we have the 1s2 and then the 2s2 and 2p2 is the makeup of that electron configuration. The remaining electrons—the ones shown in green in this case, which are closest to the core—do not react under normal circumstances.

    01:27 So if we look, for example, at the core for phosphorus, which has the chemical symbol P, we can see that it has the configuration 1s2, 2s2, 2p6, 3s2, and 3p3. The reality is that only those five electrons in the third shell react. The 2p6, 2s2, and 1s2 do not engage in chemical reactions. Yes, there are a number of things you can do with those, but principally speaking, when we're talking about either covalent or ionic bond formation, we're talking only about those electrons in the outer shell. And so often, what you will find, since those… that's all that matters, is that this extended electron configuration is abbreviated, shortened, where we use the electron configuration of the nearest noble gas (in this case, neon) and just add on the outer shell electrons to indicate how it might react. Okay. In nature, as you'll observe, the lowest possible energy is always the most desired state. So if you consider, for example, how a ball on a table, if pushed ever so slightly, will fall the distance from the table to the floor. Items, objects—in this case, electrons—are always looking at a way of giving up energy, giving up their potential energy. And the most stable atomic configurations are where we have completely filled shells. So if you recall, helium, neon, argon, krypton, xenon, and radon, as shown here on the extract of the periodic table, are all noble gases. They all have completely filled shells, and therefore, they're unreactive and are one of the only things to exist purely in their atomic form in nature.

    About the Lecture

    The lecture Valence Electrons – Quantum Numbers by Adam Le Gresley, PhD is from the course Chemistry: Introduction.

    Included Quiz Questions

    1. 1s2 2s2 2p6 3s2 3p6 4s2 3d6
    2. 1s2 2s2 2p6 3s2 3p6 4s0 3d8
    3. 1s2 2s2 2p6 3s2 3p6 3d6 4s2
    4. 1s2 2s2 2p6 3s2 3p6 4s2 3d4 4p2
    5. 1s2 2s2 2p6 3s2 3p6 3d4 4s2
    1. …have completely filled shells.
    2. …have half-filled shells.
    3. …have two-third filled shells.
    4. …have one-third filled shells.
    5. …have one-fourth filled shells.
    1. Due to completely filled shells
    2. Due to half-filled shells with opposite spins
    3. Due to the presence of three electrons with parallel spins in the outermost shell
    4. Due to presence of only two electron with opposite spins in the outermost shell
    5. Due to the presence of three electrons paired with three protons in the outermost shell

    Author of lecture Valence Electrons – Quantum Numbers

     Adam Le Gresley, PhD

    Adam Le Gresley, PhD

    Customer reviews

    5,0 of 5 stars
    5 Stars
    4 Stars
    3 Stars
    2 Stars
    1  Star