00:00
In this lecture, we’re going to discuss Toxic Shock. So, toxic shock is a distributive shock caused
by an endotoxin released by bacteria. Most commonly, this is <i>Staph aureus</i>, which releases the
toxin TSST-1 or group A beta-hemolytic strep. Basically, the bacterial toxin causes cell death,
and toxins act as a super-energen. They overstimulate the immune system and cause a release
of cytokines that causes vascular distributional problems such as dilatation and increased
leakiness. Patients generally have systemic effects, typically from a small or insignificant seeming
source. About half of cases are from tampons. So, women who leave a tampon in too long or use
a hyperabsorbent tampon can have a <i>Staph</i> that colonizes that tampon and grows. The toxin is
then released from where those <i>Staph</i> are growing, get into the systemic system and cause their
effect. So, there are certain criteria for diagnosing toxic shock. Patients must have fever, they
should have a blood pressure, which is below the 5th percentile and they should have a blanching
erythematous rash or erythroderma, which is a diffuse red rash. Generally, patients will have
involvement of 3 organ systems. This may be the GI system, they present with vomiting; they
may develop a myositis and have an increased CPK, this can present as sore muscles. They often
develop mucous membrane hyperemia generally of the eye, the mouth or the genitals, and they
may develop renal dysfunction, and thus we can detect an increased creatinine on lab work.
02:00
Patients may develop a hepatitis or bumped LFTs, they often develop a thrombocytopenia or a
low platelet count, and they can certainly have altered mental status. One thing that we find
later in toxic shock that patients should be aware of is peeling hands and feet. Sometimes that
clinches the diagnosis when we weren’t really sure earlier. There are other potential causes of
patients presenting in this way that we should think about when we see patients. One is a systemic
allergic reaction. Patients may develop serum sickness either from antibody use like horse
antibodies for certain antivenoms or for example from amoxicillin. Scarlet fever can certainly
create many of these symptoms especially the peeling of the hands and feet afterwards. There
are a variety of tick-borne illnesses such as Rocky Mountain Spotted Fever or ehrlichia that can
present similarly. Measles might be mistaken but measles does have the classic finding of
conjunctivitis followed by the head-to-foot rash, and meningitis or encephalitis may look similar
to this. Basically, these patients are very, very sick. So, if we see patients like this, we have to
worry about disseminated intravascular coagulation. So, typically, we’re going to get a broad
spectrum of labs to try and figure out what’s going on. This includes the CBC, coagulation
studies like PT, PTT, and INR. We should get a chem-7 to look for the bumped creatinine in these
patients. We should check a CPK because that will often cleanse the diagnosis, and we should
look for bumped LFTs. We usually get a blood culture as well, because especially for group A
<i>Strep</i> a huge percentage of these patients will have a positive blood culture and be bacteremic.
03:51
This is less likely in patients who have tampons or have a small abscess somewhere that is the
source of the toxin. Also, if we do have an abscess, it’s useful to do an I&D and drain that and
get a culture because it’s nice to know what antibiotic we should be using to target this particular
bacteria. What’s critical in patients with toxic shock is we have to examine all post pubertal
females immediately and remove possible retained tampon, even if there’s no history of a retained
tampon. It absolutely happens that young women can forget that they left their tampon in, or
it can go farther up in and they’ve lost it. So, you should always do a complete vaginal exam on
all post puberty females who present with toxic shock. It’s important to treat all sources of
infection: strep throat, drain any abscesses, etc., because if we don’t kill the bacteria that’s
causing the toxic shock, the toxic shock will continue. We provide supportive care in the forms
of IV boluses, dopamine therapy for recalcitrant or hard to treat hypotension, and of course
airway support as well. In severe cases, some people use IVIg. IVIg acts as a competitive
inhibitor for the immune system to fight off those extra FC regions as opposed to attacking the
body. It may help a little bit, it’s not clear, but we certainly use it in severe cases. So, let’s talk
about management of patients and if they come in in toxic shock, what antibiotics we use.
05:30
There’s a lot of different style practices but generally speaking, we tend to double or even triple
cover for gram positives under these circumstances, and there’s an interesting reason why.
05:42
First off, most practitioners will start vancomycin. This is because a small percentage of bacteria
such as MRSA may be resistant to other forms of antibiotics. Toxic shock patients are severely
ill. We can’t afford to have even the slightest chance of a resistant organism because if we
aren’t treating it, they’re going to get worse. So, we routinely give vancomycin for these patients.
06:11
However, vancomycin does not block the ribosome of the bacteria; clindamycin does. So, many
practitioners will add clindamycin because of the theory that it will reduce toxin production by
blocking the ribosomal activity of that particular bacteria. Remember, the toxin is really the
part that’s causing the problem. So, sometimes people will do vancomycin and clindamycin. In
addition, patients may be given a first generation cephalosporin, all 3. Now, the reason for the
first generation cephalosporin is that it tends to kill things faster. The first generation cephalosporin
here is bactericidal rather than bacteriostatic. Thus, because this patient is critically ill, we may
give all 3 approaching different things: the vancomycin for resistant forms, the clindamycin for
stopping toxin production and the first generation cephalosporin for killing these bacteria
faster. Eventually, we need to transition to oral therapy and typically we will transition to
either cephalexin, which is an oral first generation cephalosporin, or oral clindamycin, depending
on what the organism is that has grown or what we might empirically think is most likely given
the clinical circumstances of the patient. So, it’s important to prevent further toxic shock
episodes and especially in women, further avoidance of hyperabsorbing tampons is advised. In
fact, some providers recommend no tampons ever again for those women. The concern is is that
the vagina may continue to harbour that organism in small numbers that's essentially just waiting
for a tampon to grow up on. So, avoidance of tampons in these patients is critical certainly until
they can be cleared for further tampon use and sometimes that’s not for years. I usually refer
them to an obstetrician and gynecologist for further advice regarding this care. Vaginal
colonization is important and so we have to prevent that from happening, and remember, tampon
use is generally avoided in these patients. That’s all I have to talk to you today about Toxic
Shock in Children. Thanks for your time.