00:01
So, we've started to approach
the big picture of a passage
first from either a top
down or bottom up approach.
00:09
Those two kind of
converged together.
00:12
Then we've started to look
at how structure of a passage
can itself give you a
clue as to the big idea.
00:20
We looked at how
rhetorical devices
can dress up the central
logic of a passage.
00:26
Now we're going to drill down into
unique usages of everyday language,
and how authors might
use language differently
than your I to
get a point across.
00:38
We'll move forward from
a basic examination
of deviation from
standard language usage
into the specific concepts
of contradictory language,
definitions of word in context
and abrupt transitions.
00:51
Beyond these definitions
and contexts,
we'll use just context
more generally to clarify
other ambiguous or
confusing passage language.
01:02
First, just another analogy
to keep you engaged.
01:05
The classic platform fighting video
game, Super Smash Brothers Melee,
released in 2006, is well known for
its technical and unforgiving gameplay.
01:15
Players utilize decision making trees
with long strings of optimal moves
based on known situations,
but the player who dominates
the overall metagame as
a player known as Mango.
01:28
Mango was well known for
using suboptimal moves
when his opponents
least expected.
01:36
Likewise, when CARS passage
authors sit down to write,
they are fully aware
of common perceptions
and expectations that shape how
a given topic will be treated.
01:48
Now, those basic
structures we discussed
such as point and
counterpoint structures
for political science passages
will generally be adhered to.
01:57
But when diving into a specific
topic, to communicate a point,
in order to kind of throw
off those expectations,
authors will often
subvert those and write in
nonstandard language to
grab the reader's attention.
02:13
It is crucial, therefore to
recognize that CARS passages
are not just a neutral list of facts
but a complex and nuanced sharing of opinions.
02:26
CARS questions will often be built around
these nonstandard usages of language.
02:32
As stated, these include
contradictions within the passage,
redefining a word away from its dictionary
definition based on immediate context,
and transitioning
abruptly between ideas
in order to kind of
jar readers awake.
02:48
CARS passages cannot be perused
with a superficial reading.
02:53
Every moment you spend on a CARS
passage needs to be imbued with purpose,
intention, determination, that you're
going to grab every bit of meaning
that you can get out of even
the most innocent of phrases.
03:09
An interesting experiment
is to track in a cardinal fashion
first, second, third, and so forth,
which CARS questions you get wrong
for every CARS passage you take
across a practice sectional.
03:22
Provided your understanding
of the passage
increases as you work
through each question,
you may find that you miss earlier
questions more often than later ones.
03:33
To remedy the fact that your
understanding of a passage
might increase the more
questions you answer,
you might consider answering all
the questions in a given set,
and then re reviewing
your answer selections
just for the first
question or two.
03:48
Unlike the sciences, I don't generally
recommend trying to finish CARS
early to come back to passages just
because there's a lot of rereading
that you'd have to do if you
were to go with that strategy.
04:00
By using this double tech strategy
of the first one or two questions,
kind of allows you to get some
of the benefits of rereading
without losing the time that
would be necessary to do so.
04:15
Words, phrases,
even transitions that an author uses
in an out of the ordinary fashion must
be defined by the surrounding context.
04:25
When an author is attempting
to establish this new meaning,
your only goal is to
infer what that is.
04:32
This is actually good news
for those of you worried
if your vocabulary is strong
enough for the CARS section.
04:38
Don't be intimidated if you
don't understand every word
based on its literal
dictionary definition.
04:45
Understanding how and
why an author is using
an unfamiliar word,
phrase or transition
tends to be sufficient to
answer the vast majority
of definition in
context questions.