00:01 Let's now transition to the intrinsic renal portion. 00:04 So diseases that actually affect the tubules and interstitium are what we're gonna focus on. 00:09 And that includes acute tubular necrosis, acute interstitial nephritis and acute tubular obstruction. 00:18 So you're asked to see a 56-year-old gentleman who recently underwent coronary angiography with stent placement to his left anterior descending artery for acute coronary syndrome. 00:28 His serum creatinine was noted to increase 2 days following the procedure. 00:33 His physical exam is relatively unremarkable and his serological labs show that his serum creatinine is elevated to 2.3 mg/dL, so we see that that's high. 00:44 And his creatinine was 0.9 (mg/dL) which is normal on the day of the angiography, His BUN is only slightly elevated at 28 mg/dl. 00:53 He's given 2 liters of normal saline but his creatinine continues to rise. 00:57 So the question is, what type of acute kidney injury does this gentleman have? Let's go through our case and see if we can answer that question. 01:05 In the history, I think it's very important to note that temporal correlation between the administration of contrast and the creatinine rising essentially 48 hours after contrast administration. 01:17 We can also see on the laboratory data that that BUN to creatinine ratio is actually less than 15:1. 01:25 And when we see that, taken together with the history, that's very suggestive of a tubular injury. 01:31 The fact that he doesn't get better with volume replacement trying to correct his renal hemodynamics, really does suggest that there's intrinsic renal disease going on here. 01:40 So the answer to our case, is that this gentleman does have intrinsic renal disease and in fact, has acute tubular necrosis from his radiocontrast administration.
The lecture Renal Case: 56-year-old Man with Coronary Angiography by Amy Sussman, MD is from the course Acute Kidney Injury (AKI).
What effect can radiocontrast have on kidney function?
5 Stars |
|
0 |
4 Stars |
|
0 |
3 Stars |
|
0 |
2 Stars |
|
0 |
1 Star |
|
1 |
When was it mentioned that a ratio of 15:1 is suggestive of tubular injury? I don't think this lecture give enough information to us to specifically call this a ATN. Confusing.