00:01
A discussion of resource allocation is fundamental
to any ethical discussion of how we practice medicine.
00:07
Resource allocation in healthcare describes the constellation
of decisions and actions that prioritize healthcare needs.
00:16
We would define rationing as the distribution of any
needed thing or procedure that is in short supply
to those who need it in accord with a set of rules
that assure fair distribution of these resources.
00:29
Let's take a little bit more of a look at the concept
of justice and how it relates to resource allocation.
00:34
Healthcare workers should aim to safeguard
the interest of patients. That is undeniable.
00:39
However, a just process should be used to
determine an adequate level of healthcare.
00:45
And then, finally, how one decides what is fair
and what is just can be challenging to determine.
00:51
This is where we enter into these ethical discussions
of the scarce resource allocation process.
00:58
Now, when it comes to ethical decisions
in healthcare resource allocation
in healthcare ethical dilemmas, oftentimes,
the focus, justifiably so, is on individual patients.
01:11
Nevertheless, when we prioritize
systematic healthcare needs,
the focus of decision shifts from the individual
patient to a group of patients.
01:23
This might be, for example, a national population or it could be
a local community of users or of a specific service.
01:31
We've already covered the four basic ethical
principles and we've discussed them in some detail.
01:36
Let's take a look at how these may apply specifically
to the concept of resource allocation.
01:40
Autonomy is the ability of a patient to decide
his or her own healthcare.
01:44
However, because of resource, maybe scarce does not necessarily
mean a patient may want to partake of that resource.
01:50
So, autonomy must be considered.
Justice is distributive in nature.
01:56
So, therefore, we want to look at scarce resources
and how these can be allocated fairly
to a population whose need or demand
may exceed the supply of resources.
02:06
Beneficence. Well, it stands to reason that
these resources will do good for patients.
02:11
Any resource allocated to a patient must be something
that has an inherent good which benefits a patient.
02:16
With regard to non-maleficence
or the opposite of beneficence,
this can be viewed in terms of taking a scarce resource
away from one patient to give it to another patient.
02:27
When this is done, we may cause harm and this needs
to be examined closely before these decisions are made.
02:33
So, a balance, in fact, needs to be struck
between respect for individual autonomy
and fair distribution of limited resources which
may potentially benefit the whole population.
02:43
This tension between the benefit
to the individual and to the social group
is constantly kept in mind by those
who make these decisions.
02:52
So, now, let's take a look at the concept of utilitarianism
and how it relates to resource allocation.
02:58
So, one may define utilitarianism as the ethical
theory that prioritizes community
or population-level decisions above
that concerning any individual.
03:08
The ethically correct action according to
a pure utilitarian point of view may be that
which results in the
maximum overall benefit.
03:18
However, there are those
who find this problematic
and who say that the improvement in health
for an individual cannot be disregarded
and therefore, we must keep this in balance with
regard to a utilitarian or overall benefit of a resource.
03:33
Now, there are two primary criticisms
of a utilitarianism theory.
03:37
The first is the one that I just mentioned
and that's that there's a failure
to consider the need for healthcare
intervention on a case by case basis.
03:46
In addition to that, we would say that it fails
to continue the need for healthcare intervention
and it relies rather heavily on cost-effectiveness.
What is an alternative to this utilitarianism theory?
Well, we might look at the theory of
the philosopher, Emmanuel Kant.
04:03
And he talked about
the concept of deontology.
04:06
Deontology is duty ethics and this argues that
the end does not always justify the means.
04:12
So, keeping deontology and utilitarianism in balance with each other
is very important to make appropriate decisions.