00:01
There are important considerations
when thinking about DNAR orders.
00:05
So, the first is that it only applies to resuscitative interventions.
It's only with regard to CPR.
00:14
It should not mean it speaks to
other aspects of the patient's care.
00:18
So, any other decisions about their goals of care really
need to be framed for those particular decisions.
00:26
So, whether there's antibiotics,
whether they're going to have dialysis,
whether they're going to get
appropriate symptom management,
all of those need to be done based
on the patient's wishes.
00:36
There have been studies to show that sometimes
when patients have a DNAR order in place,
it does impact on other aspects
of their care but it should not
We should really have separate discussions
with the patients about those other aspects of the care
which should only apply to the
cardiac arrest, the pulmonary arrest,
and whether or not
we're going to do CPR.
00:59
It's also important that, you know,
we revisit these decisions overtime.
01:05
So, again, this is sort of prospectively
doing informed consent with the patient
before we actually need to institute
the treatment, in this case, the CPR.
01:16
So, a person might make a decision
at a particular point in time,
I want to have resuscitative measures,
we might otherwise call, you know, being full code.
01:24
But then, as their condition changes
or their clinical circumstances change in other ways,
we revisit and maybe they would decide,
no, I do not want CPR in this situation.
01:38
And there may be, you know, times where it goes,
you know, the person's incredibly ill, you know, very sick.
01:44
We don't think CPR
would be successful.
01:47
Maybe they're septic but maybe
you give them the proper antibiotics.
01:52
Their sepsis improves.
Their overall condition improves.
01:56
Maybe while they were septic, they decide
or their family members decided against CPR.
02:01
But now that they've recovered, they said,
"No, I would want to attempt resuscitation.
02:06
I'm doing better. I want to see if I,
you know, can continue to - on the road to recovery.
02:13
Another thing to consider is maybe patients
have put in orders to not have resuscitation.
02:20
But then, they're going in for a procedure,
either a diagnostic procedure or a surgery or an operation
and there are going to be times
where they're going to need
to be on a ventilator for
instance for general anesthesia.
02:35
So, the effects of the anesthesia might
lead to cardiopulmonary derangement
or even, you know,
cardiopulmonary arrest.
02:44
In that very controlled environment,
it might be possible for an anesthesiologist
to reverse the effects of the anesthesia,
you know, on its effects on the heart or on the breathing.
02:54
And bring back the heart rhythm
for instance, return circulation.
03:00
So, the patient needs to
be asked preoperatively,
what would you want done with
regard to resuscitation measures?
Perhaps they had prior made the decision
for do not attempt resuscitation.
03:11
Now, they're going in for an operation.
03:13
It shouldn't be a default that they
automatically go to having resuscitation.
03:17
They should be asked, do you want to maintain
your do not attempt resuscitation order
or do you want to suspend it for the period
of the procedure or the operation?
And then, we can reinstitute
it after the procedure.
03:30
So, this, again, is an informed consent
process you're trying to figure out
what are in alignment
with the patient's wishes.
03:37
Another consideration with regard to
DNAR orders is times
when the family disagrees with
preestablished orders about resuscitation.
03:47
So, take example, of a patient that
makes a decision for DNAR.
03:52
They've had a conversation with
their physician while they had capacity
and came to the conclusion that CPR
would not be in their best interest.
04:01
So, a DNAR order is placed.
The patient then loses capacity
and now, they have a surrogate decision-maker
that has to come and make decisions.
04:12
The family may say, "Well, no, we want to
reverse that earlier DNAR order
and have the patient
receive resuscitation."
It becomes a very tricky
circumstance in clinical medicine.
04:26
No easy answer about how to resolve
these kind of issues.
04:30
I would say that legally and ethically,
if you know that the patient has clear wishes,
you've had a conversation with them,
and you know that a DNAR order
is consistent with their wishes
and their preferences,
you should try to uphold those wishes
and say to the family, "I'm sorry.
04:48
My job as a clinician is to
respect the patient's wishes.
04:53
Their wish was for no CPR.
I need to follow-through with that."
The family may object but, again, if their role
is to speak to the patient's preferences and values,
they should also honor what the patient said
previously about DNAR and keep the DNAR orders in place.
05:14
So, it's a complicated area.
There's only one particular order,
one particular kind of life-sustaining treatment
but it comes up often enough
that we need to have a strategy about how
to have these discussions with the patients and families.
05:27
And as I said, I really see this as
an informed consent process.
05:30
There's either informed consent
or informed refusal for CPR.
05:36
It should be based on
the patient's values.
05:39
So, you should always start with the goals
of care discussion about who the patient is,
how they live their life, what's important
in their life, what are their health values,
what are the things
they're hoping to achieve?
Put that in the context
of their medical condition.
05:54
Know what the chances of success might be
if CPR in that, you know, particular condition
and then, reach a decision together about
what's going to be in the best interest of the patient.