00:01
Let's talk now about
the differences between
forecasting and dynamic models.
00:05
Forecasting models
use real data.
00:10
Actual incidence numbers.
00:12
And it predicts how an epidemic
is going to look in the near term,
in the next few weeks.
00:21
A dynamic model, on the other hand,
uses broader indicators
like the case fatality rates,
observed in other populations,
maybe we use some curve fitting.
00:31
We assume that the epidemic
will take a certain shape
and we apply these indicators
to make resemble our population.
00:39
Now, dynamic model
is meant to predict
how an epidemic will behave
in the longer term
more than just weeks,
perhaps months.
00:51
So, here is an example of a
forecasting model
for COVID-19 daily deaths
in New York State,
in the middle of 2020.
01:01
The red line shows us
the actual deaths,
and the blue line shows us
what's projected to happen.
01:10
So, this would be
a forecasting model
or what's happening
in the next few weeks.
01:15
So, the forecasting model,
done in April 20
predicted they would see
100 deaths a day by May 1st.
01:23
They actually saw
300 deaths a day.
01:25
And they will see fewer than five
by May 27.
01:28
They actually saw 100
by the end.
01:30
So, in this case,
the forecast was off,
which often happens,
a model is very often wrong.
01:37
But again, sometimes it's useful
in the ways in which it is wrong.
01:43
This is an example of what's called
the IDEA model.
01:53
This is the IDEA model of Ontario.
01:57
IDEA is I-D-E-A
and it stands for the
Incidence Decay
and Exponential Adjustment.
02:04
And it was a model devised by
Dr. David Fisman
of the University of Toronto.
02:09
And it's a forecasting model
that uses actual data.
02:13
So, here we have
the actual daily cases
shown in pink or red,
and the cumulative cases
shown in blue.
02:20
In here, this has a
short term projection
of how the epidemic of COVID-19
was supposed to decline
over the course of these weeks.
02:33
And by the way, the model is very
accurately predicted very well.
02:39
Here is an example of a
dynamic model for COVID-19.
02:43
This was presented by
the Government of Canada
in April of 2020.
02:49
And it showed you how they thought
the epidemic would unfold
in the nation of Canada
in the coming months.
02:58
So they put forth
three different scenarios.
03:03
In the blue, there's a strong
epidemic control scenario, right?
So, if we were to implement
physical distancing,
or very good contact tracing,
then we can get
infection rates down quite low.
03:19
The pink or red curve
describes weaker controls.
03:23
So, maybe people
didn't distance as well.
03:25
In which case, we'd have
a higher infection peak.
03:29
But with Farr's law in place, the
epidemic curve was still diminished.
03:34
And the green curve describes,
what would happen if we did nothing?
70 to 80% of the population
would be infected,
and a certain percentage of those
individuals would be hospitalized,
and a certain percentage of them
would die.
03:49
The implication of this model
is that, we had to act.
03:54
We had to implement
some population controls.
03:57
Stronger is better than weaker.
03:59
If the stronger controls
are put into place,
then we would have
no more cases by the fall.
04:06
In reality,
what happened was
the first wave diminished
by the end of June.
04:12
And the second wave began in spring,
in rather in September.
04:16
But this model was useful
in conveying the direness
of the situation
and the need to act fast,
with strong epidemic controls
to prevent the overwhelming
of the healthcare system.
04:31
I've mentioned this quote
several times.
04:33
"All models are wrong,
but some are useful."
It's an important thing
to remember.
04:38
Because models have so
many built in assumptions,
that they do not really describe
the real world.
04:47
What they do is present scenarios
for planning and for understanding
the likely path of a disease.
04:56
But to assume that a model
can predict
with the high a degree
of precision,
actual incidence and death rates
is probably a problematic
thing to do.
05:08
"Models are only really as useful
as the assumptions
that you put into them."
This is true for all models,
not just disease models
anything in mathematics.
05:22
So, we have to be careful about
the assumptions that we make,
and interpret
the curves and the data
with some
nuance and sensitivity.