00:01
Okay, let's place these
perspectives of the author
into the context of the
arguments that they are making.
00:07
To do this, we'll need a few tools.
00:10
First, separate your opinions
from those of the author.
00:14
And once you've done that,
put yourself into
the author's shoes.
00:18
And lastly, from those shoes
apply fundamental rules of logic
that need to remain constant
regardless of what argument
an author is making.
00:29
Imagine with me that a car's author
makes the claim
that the sky is orange.
00:34
It would be tempting to bring
in your outside knowledge
and state of the sky
is in fact blue.
00:42
Later in the passage, however,
you might learn that the author only
goes outside at sunrise or sunset.
00:49
So for him,
the sky is always orange.
00:54
This proposition could also
be elicited in a question
where it might ask you
what is a plausible explanation
for this odd conclusion
of the author.
01:06
You're just looking at arguments
and claims and a passage
and asking yourself within
the limited context I'm given
are these cohesive with
respect to each other,
and also to the whole?
This does touch upon another
point, however,
and that is that
fundamental rules of logic
still need to be adhered to.
01:29
If the claim that
the sky were orange,
were made by someone
who sells hot dogs
from a stand in New York City,
you would have to conclude
that the person was
colorblind or perhaps joking.
01:40
The same viewpoint
within a CARS passage
can be expressed in different ways,
depending on the author.
01:46
In one passage of viewpoint
may be presented as a neutral fact.
01:49
Whereas in another,
it could be expressed as
satire or social commentary.
01:56
Indeed, the evaluation of logic and
the soundness of arguments thereof
is the skill set required for
your success on the CARS section.
02:08
Up to this point,
we've seen that question stems
can prompt you to make connections
across existing information
within a passage.
02:14
But the next card is
question type we will examine
will introduce new facts,
ideas, and opinions formed
to the passage itself.
02:23
This question type is known
as reasoning beyond the text
that summarize what
we've just discussed.
02:28
Then we will move forward
to this final question type.