Emergency Medicine Patient Presentation: Relevant Factors

by Julianna Jung, MD, FACEP

My Notes
  • Required.
Save Cancel
    Learning Material 2
    • PDF
      Emergency Medicine EM Patient Presentation.pdf
    • PDF
      Download Lecture Overview
    Report mistake

    00:03 Hello.

    00:04 Now, we're gonna talk about presentation of patients in the Emergency Department.

    00:09 So what is the Emergency Medicine patient presentation? Very simply, it’s a style of presentation that organizes information in the way that we think as emergency medicine physicians.

    00:22 And it's important because it’s the means by which you're gonna be talking about all of your patients to your clinical preceptors so you're gonna be communicating information using this presentation style.

    00:33 It's a major determinant of the care that your patient receives.

    00:37 So if you pass on information that is complete, and accurate, and thorough and paints the right clinical picture for your colleagues, your patients are gonna get good care.

    00:47 But if you leave out important details, they might not get the care that they really need.

    00:52 And probably, most importantly for you as a medical student, it’s a major determinant of the grades that you're gonna get.

    00:58 So the better you get at presenting presentations in the emergency medicine style, the more impressive you're gonna to be to your preceptors and the better your evaluations are gonna be in the clinical area.

    01:08 What’s different about the emergency medicine presentation compared to other types of patient presentations? One, we are always focused on one single chief complaint or presenting problem.

    01:22 Whereas other fields might focus on a larger, more global picture of what's going on with the patient.

    01:29 Two, we limit ourselves to that single chief complaint and we only include elements of the past medical history that are relevant to that chief complaint.

    01:40 Whereas in other fields, presentations often include a comprehensive problem list, a complete past history that includes medications, social history, family history, prior surgeries, etc.

    01:53 For us, we pick and choose what elements of that past history we think are important.

    01:59 Three, we prioritize our differential diagnosis by severity.

    02:04 I talked in the last lecture about the differential of consequence and that’s what we use to prioritize our differential diagnosis in the ED.

    02:11 Whereas in other settings, the differential is typically prioritized by likelihood.

    02:17 Four, our emphasis in the ED is on the immediate plan right now.

    02:22 What tests are we gonna get today? What treatments are we gonna prescribe right here in the ED, and what’s the disposition gonna be? Is this patient gonna be admitted? Discharged? Sent to the ICU? Sent to the operating room? We have to decide those things right here and now.

    02:36 Whereas in other specialties, a lot of times care is focused on more long term objectives.

    02:42 So what's the overall hospital course gonna be? What's the definitive management gonna be? What's the final outcome gonna be for this patient as opposed to the immediate steps that have to take place right now? Lastly in the ED, we often don’t know the definitive diagnosis for our patient.

    02:59 We very commonly have to make decisions about treatment and disposition without actually establishing what's wrong with them.

    03:06 Whereas much more commonly in other specialties, the diagnosis is established because they have the benefit of a longer time to get to know the patient and more elaborate test results to get to the bottom of their problems.

    03:19 So the structure of presentations in the ED is very straightforward.

    03:24 It's always gonna start off with that history of present illness which is gonna be the story of what brought the patient to the ED today.

    03:32 From there, we're gonna move on to the relevant past medical and surgical history.

    03:37 The relevant pieces of the physical exam, not a comprehensive head to toe exam but the relevant maneuvers that will help us establish a diagnosis.

    03:47 Clinical data by which I mean: laboratory tests, EKGs, imaging results, etc.

    03:54 And lastly, an assessment and plan.

    03:56 Those are the elements that have to be included in every presentation, every time.

    04:03 So starting off with the history of present illness.

    04:06 I would just like to say, this is the single most important part of the presentation, and probably 80-85% of the information that you get about the patient that leads you to a diagnosis is drawn from a high quality history of present illness.

    04:22 So your focus in the HPI is gonna be on the chief complaint.

    04:25 Why is the patient here in the emergency department today? What brought them out of their home into the hospital right now for this particular problem? We always wanna generate a clear, linear illness narrative.

    04:39 We wanna know what past events got them to this point, what they're experiencing right now, and what they're concerned about moving forward.

    04:51 We wanna make sure that we include all the pertinent positives and negatives from the review of systems, so we are not gonna necessarily do a comprehensive head to toe review of systems on every patient, but we definitely wanna get information that’s gonna help us broaden or narrow our differential based on the patient’s HPI.

    05:10 And lastly, we always omit extraneous detail.

    05:14 So if we're not certain it belongs in our history of present illness, we shouldn’t put it in.

    05:18 Only the relevant facts, please.

    05:22 When we're talking about the past medical history, We're gonna always include the essential elements of the past history in the opening statement of the history of present illness.

    05:32 And what I mean by that is, I'm not gonna tell you a whole story about this patient’s chest pain, without mentioning that they've had five heart attacks in the past or seven pulmonary emboli or whatever the past history is.

    05:44 So we're gonna start off saying, this is a 64-year-old woman who has a history of five prior myocardial infarctions and has three coronary stents who presents with chest pain.

    05:56 That’s gonna give us a much clearer picture of who this person is before we even launch into the history of present illness.

    06:03 When I do get into the past medical history section, I'm only gonna discuss aspects of this past history that are pertinent to today’s visit, so I'm not gonna give you a comprehensive history, I'm gonna just talk about the things that are important today, and I'm gonna omit elements that don't contribute to understanding of the current problem today.

    06:21 So for a patient who comes in with chest pain, it probably doesn’t matter all that much that they had sinus surgery five years ago, that's probably not a fact that's relevant in their past history and I'm not gonna include it in my ED presentation.

    06:35 The items to include or exclude are entirely dependent on the history of present illness, so it's really, really important when you think about what's relevant and what isn’t to always focus it back on the chief complaint and the history of present illness because that's what's gonna determine what information you should or you should not include.

    06:54 When we do the physical exam, we wanna examine every organ system that might be implicated in the patients current presentation today.

    07:02 So if they come in with abdominal pain, obviously, I'm gonna examine the abdomen, right? But if I'm worried that it could potentially be an anginal equivalent in an older patient, I'm gonna do a heart and lung exam.

    07:12 If I'm worried that there could be an underlying neurologic etiology for their pain, I'm gonna do a neuro exam.

    07:17 So I'm gonna wanna make sure I cast a broad net and examine the relevant organ systems.

    07:22 I wanna describe my exam findings clearly and succinctly so you gonna wanna work on all of that great descriptive language that you learned in your physical diagnosis courses.

    07:32 I wanna always include descriptions of severity, so I wanna be able to indicate whether the patient has maybe a little bit of tenderness when I press her, if they have an exquisitely tender abdomen, and I wanna emphasize findings that either point towards or away from life threatening problems.

    07:50 So I'm always thinking about that differential of consequence, and I'm trying to highlight pieces of data that either rule in or rule out items on that differential of consequence.

    08:01 So when we present clinical data, we wanna make sure that we describe the relevant findings from labs, radiology studies, and the ECG.

    08:11 We only wanna give specific values for key findings.

    08:14 So if something is normal, it's fine to just say, "The CBC is normal." Where if you are concerned about one specific finding, the hemoglobin is four, that would be a situation where you wanna give a specific value.

    08:28 You wanna always indicate if important tests are still pending so that the listener knows that you know that there are important pieces of data that are gonna ultimately inform your clinical decision making, and you don’t wanna give a laundry list of every single finding.

    08:41 You wanna prioritize what's important, get the key pieces of information out there and then stop.

    08:47 If the listener wants additional pieces of information you didn’t describe, they can always ask, but nobody wants to hear a litany of 75 irrelevant test results when there's really one or two key pieces of clinical data that we're looking for.

    09:04 So when you give your assessment and plan, you wanna bring it all together.

    09:08 So you wanna start off with a summary's data — a summary statement that brings together all of the key pieces of data from your history of present illness, your physical exam, and your ancillary testing.

    09:21 And when you start talking about your differential diagnosis, you wanna address the worst concerns first.

    09:28 Your differential of consequence.

    09:30 So you wanna make sure that as you describe your assessment of the patient, you are either supporting or refuting diagnoses from that differential of consequence based on what your clinical impression is.

    09:42 You only wanna address your likely diagnoses once your serious diagnoses have already been discussed and you wanna make sure that you emphasize the plan.

    09:53 A lot of times, medical students kind of trail off at the end of the assessment and plan coz they really don’t know what to do.

    09:59 But we wanna make sure that you give it your best shot.

    10:01 Describe what you think should be done for the patient.

    10:04 What further test do they need? How do you wanna treat them? What's their disposition gonna be? The worst that can happen is you know maybe you’ll be wrong and you’ll have an opportunity to talk about why with your preceptor, but you wanna start practicing getting your own plan out there and committing to a course of action for your patient coz that's how you learn to make clinical decisions.

    About the Lecture

    The lecture Emergency Medicine Patient Presentation: Relevant Factors by Julianna Jung, MD, FACEP is from the course Emergency Medicine: General Topics.

    Included Quiz Questions

    1. Differentials are prioritized by likelihood.
    2. EM is focused on a specific presenting problem.
    3. The DDx is prioritized by severity, not by likelihood.
    4. The emphasis is on the immediate plan of management.
    5. The definitive diagnosis may be unknown.
    1. Extraneous details
    2. Pertinent positives
    3. Pertinent negatives
    4. Linear illness narrative
    5. Chief complaint
    1. History of Present Illness
    2. Relevant physical examination
    3. Relevant past history
    4. Clinical data
    5. Assessment and plan
    1. A complete physical examination of an acutely ill patient is always warranted before focusing on the organ systems involved in the current problem.
    2. All organ systems that may be implicated in the current problem must be examined.
    3. Any findings that point toward or away from life-threatening problems must be emphasized.
    4. The findings must be described clearly and succinctly.
    5. A description of the severity must be included.
    1. Summary statement
    2. ‘Worst first’ diagnoses
    3. Benign diagnoses
    4. Ancillary tests needed
    5. Disposition of the patient
    1. Omit ancillary tests with pending results.
    2. Describe relevant findings from tests.
    3. Give specific values for key findings.
    4. Avoid creating a laundry list of all findings.
    5. Prioritize what is important.

    Author of lecture Emergency Medicine Patient Presentation: Relevant Factors

     Julianna Jung, MD, FACEP

    Julianna Jung, MD, FACEP

    Customer reviews

    5,0 of 5 stars
    5 Stars
    4 Stars
    3 Stars
    2 Stars
    1  Star
    Concise & Clear
    By Frank W. on 22. September 2022 for Emergency Medicine Patient Presentation: Relevant Factors

    Dr Jung is concise and clear in showing the clear pathway for communicating in Emergency Medicine!

    By Burton D. on 23. June 2022 for Emergency Medicine Patient Presentation: Relevant Factors

    Amazing lecture. Thanks so much for this easy to understand presentation.

    Full picture
    By Nariman Z. on 24. March 2021 for Emergency Medicine Patient Presentation: Relevant Factors

    I am a former ER doctor, I see this presentation as a valid and crucial for ER introduction. Thank you.