00:01
Another thing that,
especially when we're thinking
about the physician assistants,
or clinician assistants,
in this process,
is at least taking a step
back and thinking about,
is there any way
that the physician
or clinician is accountable?
Or are they part
of the causal chain
that leads to this
other person's actions?
So when we think about
culpability, in general,
I'm just going to sort
of take a step back
and think about sort of the
philosophy or ethics of this,
when we think about culpability,
there are two
necessary conditions
for when a person
might be held culpable
for another person's actions.
00:40
So first of all,
the moral agent has to have
the ability to intervene
or prevent the action
by the other person.
00:47
And second,
the moral agent has to be
bound by some obligation
to prevent the actions.
00:53
So we know that this other person
is going to perform an action,
we think it might
be a wrong action,
do we have the ability
to either intervene
or prevent them from doing it?
And are we under some obligation
to try to prevent them
from falling through
on that action.
01:11
So that leads to this issue of,
are we complicit in the
actions of another person?
So complicity can be
judged on a spectrum.
01:19
So it may be, you
know, as you know,
on the lower end of the
spectrum, just a moral taints,
you know, some blemish
on your reputation,
you could have done
more, but you didn't,
or it could be all the way to,
on the other end of the
spectrum, blame worthiness,
you're actually
being held liable,
that you were part
of the causal chain
that led to this wrong
action by the other person.
01:42
So let me have you think through
these questions and scenarios,
and you, you figure
out for yourself,
on what level of participation
would be complicit?
And what kind of participation
would avoid complicity
in another person's actions?
So when we're thinking about,
you know, participation,
as you know, whether or not
you're going to be complicit,
is discussing with
another person,
their plan, their action,
does that make you complicit?
If you're assessing the
other person's intentions
about performing that action,
does that make you complicit?
If you know that the person
is going to perform the action
and you sort of acquiesce?
Well, this is your decision.
02:25
Does that make you in any way
complicit with their action?
If you go a step further,
and try to evaluate their means
or their capability of
following through on the action,
so you're a little more involved
in the decision making
process of the other person.
02:41
What level of
complicity is that?
If you are there, present,
you know, remain when
they perform the action,
is that also going
to be complicit.
02:52
If you actually
facilitate the actions,
so let's take the
example of you know,
physician assisted suicide.
02:58
So handing them the cocktail
of the lethal medication,
facilitating the action so
that they can then drink it?
Is that complicit
in their action?
Or actually, you know,
putting the strap in their mouth
and having them swallow it,
co-performing the
action with them?
Does that make you
complicit in their action?
Now let's take the opposite
of what kinds of participation
would avoid complicity.
03:26
So what if you command
the other not to act?
You know, to you avoid being
complicit with their action.
03:33
If you counsel them and say,
I really don't think
you should act,
you should perform this action
is that avoiding any kind of
complicity in what they do.
03:44
If you consent to the
other person not acting,
say, great, you're not
going to perform the action,
you were thinking about it.
03:51
You decide not to do it,
I consent to you
not performing it.
03:56
Is encouragement to dissuade,
so actually, you know, trying
to use arguments to say,
this is wrong for you,
because of X, Y, or Z.
04:04
Is that a sign
that you are avoiding
complicity in their action?
What if you actually
threaten them?
To try to dissuade them?
Maybe that's a different
moral calculus,
but that might also help
to avoid complicity.
04:20
And then lastly,
what if you know they're
trying to perform the action,
you actually
interfere with them?
So they can't
perform the action?
Does that help you
avoid complicity?
So again, challenging
questions for you
to think about both
your involvement
in the actions of
another person,
and what might avoid complicity.